Sometimes familiar building uses are of a style so rare (like churches built during the commonwealth), they are eminently listable. To that list may I add 1980 dockland pubs, physical manifestations of the big bang, jam packed with the masters of the universe. They are rare cause the east end has so many pubs and were only built in places where there was only docks and no residential before. I can only think of three, one of which is listable
Commentary on monetary policy in the spirit of R. G. Hawtrey
WordPress.com is the best place for your personal blog or business site.
an unofficial blog of the Planning Advisory Service team
Campaigning for a Sustainable National Planning Policy Framework
A Cognitive Dissident
The Grasslands Trust team blog about nature conservation and broader environmental issues, always with a focus on our threatened grassland habitats. The views in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of the Trust.
A blog about better decisions, better urban planning and better economics
A developer blogs for Regeneration & Renewal magazine
Decisions, Decisions, Decisions 
It’s a type, not a typology. Architects often have loose language skills. Miss-use of the word ‘typology’ is one of the little consequences. 🙂
im using it in the correct sense used by urban morphologists
Well, a typology would be a catalogue of types or the study of types, as in taxonomy, or mythology. Something like 80s London Docklands pubs, or roadhouses, improved pubs, coaching inns, and so on, are types of pubs. A typology of pubs could be drawn up, differentiating various types. Likewise someone focused on urban morphology could have a go at identifying and then cataloguing types of villages, that would be a typology of villages.
Mind you, it’s ‘misuse’, not ‘miss-use’, so I’m not the clever one!