Fudgejectively Re-bodged Need – With Stunning Sloth, Maladroitness and Spitting out of Humble Pie @MCHLG acts #Oanishambles

Here

Back to 2014 base – as we suggested on here was only way out, only done in a way whch simply adds to messiness.  More on here soon

Household projections are constrained by housing supply. If new, additional
homes are not supplied, then households cannot form as there would be
nowhere for them to live. This means that actual household growth cannot
exceed the number of additional homes which are actually supplied. The ONS household projections show that the average household size is projected to be2.33 by 2028 compared to 2.27 in the 2014 based household projections; this
means that in order to just keep household size constant at the 2014 based projected level, 64,000 additional homes per year would be needed in excess of the current projections;
2. The historic under-delivery of housing means there is a case for public policy supporting delivery in excess of household projections, even if those projectionfall. Cheshire4 estimated that “between 1994 and 2012, building fell short of what was needed by between 1.6 and 2.3 million houses”. Given that households cannot form if new houses are not built for them to move into, this undersupply will have resulted in pent-up demand;

Hmmm where did that phrase about households not orming unless there are new homes for them to move into come from – try looking back at past posts on this blog.

The Government considers that the best way of responding to the new ONS
household projections and delivering on the three principles in paragraph 18 above is to make three changes:
1. For the short-term, to specify that the 2014-based data will provide the
demographic baseline for assessment of local housing need.

2. To make clear in national planning practice guidance that lower numbers through the 2016-based projections do not qualify as an exceptional circumstance that justifies a departure from the standard methodology; and
3. In the longer term, to review the formula with a view to establishing a new method that meets the principles in paragraph 18 above by the time the next projections are issued….

The Government has heard from a number of authorities that the extent of
change associated with 2016-based household growth projections, when compared to 2014-based projections, is already resulting in delays and uncertainty in the planmaking process.

 

Advertisements

One thought on “Fudgejectively Re-bodged Need – With Stunning Sloth, Maladroitness and Spitting out of Humble Pie @MCHLG acts #Oanishambles

  1. Literally oozed out from under the door, a consultation of national importance from the Government for the World’s 5th largest economy. I can’t find a press notice, or any announcement, and the headline for the document avoids any use of the word “consultation” or “seeking views”…
    I might be jaundiced, but I think I can see signs of local authorities beginning to follow this Government’s approach to consultation. Depressing isn’t the word.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s