Barwell Talks Land Value Capture

Property Week – If it was a simple tax of 1% of upzoned land in an updated local plan we would have 100% plan coverage in 2 yrs

The housing minister has raised the spectre of a tax on development aimed at capturing some of the uplift in land value that developers receive through planning permission.

Speaking at the London Property Summit last week, housing minister Gavin Barwell said the government was considering reforms to better capture planning gains, although he acknowledged it was important to get the balance right so developments are not made unviable.

He said: “Can we try to find a system that ensures developers pay a contribution from the uplift in value they get from planning permission that helps pay for the vital infrastructure we need to make new housing acceptable, but at the same time avoids conflict and avoids making schemes we want to see go ahead unviable.”

Barwell’s comments recall the hugely unpopular planning gain supplement proposed under Tony Blair’s Labour government that was abandoned after furious industry opposition.

Eventually, Labour introduced the community infrastructure levy (CIL), a planning charge based on the floor area of a new development.

Asked whether he was suggesting a beefed up version of CIL that would take in planning gain, Barwell said he did not want to “leak the contents of the [housing] white paper”, due later this month.

But he added: “We want to try to reform the system in a way that captures a contribution towards the infrastructure we need, but de-conflicts the system.”

Home Builders Federation head of planning Andrew Whitaker said any additional planning gain mechanism would dampen development and “threaten the supply of land for housing”.

Jon Gooding, chief executive of affordable housing developer Dolphin Living, said a new planning gain tax would be opposed by the industry.

“Governments have been playing around with this for decades, and they’ve always scrapped it in the end. I’m shocked that this government is thinking of revisiting it,” he said.

The Department for Communities and Local Government declined to comment.


One thought on “Barwell Talks Land Value Capture

  1. It refers to the gains made by developers when land receives a planning permission, with residential always being the most lucrative. However, why isn’t it the landowner that’s the first port of call for such things?
    I appreciate that landowners often enter into agreements with developers on the basis of securing planning permission. However, the greatest uplift in land value, when it comes to greenfield sites, is when the initial change from agri to development occurs and the developer enters into some form of legal undertaking with the landowner.
    Adding another ‘tax’ to the actual cost of development, will just give developers another item to add to their list of reasons why they can’t afford to deliver properly affordable housing and key elements of infrastructure.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s