Aecom Proposes Own Vision for London City Region

Interesting report, and unlike many recent reports relating to the Met Green Belt gets specific.  In fact despite calling the London Green Belt ‘Toxic’ they propose most development in larger new towns of around 150,000 people at key nodes, although they propose quite a lot of these around MK and Oxford.  The numbers suggest we need 4 -6 of these, so should be seen as a longlist.  With the capacity freed up by HS2 and other regional rail improvements candidates like South of Milton Keynes, North of Milton Keynes, Brackely/HS2, South of Crawley, South of Cambridge. Ebbsfleet/Swanscombe/Bluewater & St Neots look to me like realistic options.  Together with smaller urban extensions and local Garden Cities and smaller and very selective Green Belt deletions they can meet the South East’s and London’s shortfall without either the major Green Belt loss some have indicated or the random development around South East stations whether or not they have spare capacity.




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s