Cameron’s Ungrammetical Pledge Not to Protect the Green Belt – A Deliberate Osborne Fudge to Allow its Loss

From the conservative housing manifesto speech yesterday, one of 5 pledges on the CP website

Ensuring local people have more control over planning and protect the Green Belt

Note this is not ‘we will protect the Green Belt’ as seen in Conservative manifestos since 1960.

Quite apart from being a sentence with subject object verb confusion the lack of a comma is significant it does not read

‘we will ensure local people have more control over planning, and protect the Green Belt.’

No local people will protect the green belt (meaning local authorities) not the central government.  If, as the Boles /Reigate doctrine states, they want to build ion the Green Belt they can, and they may be forced to because of the combined effect of the NPPF, OAN and DTC tests.

The wording is clearly a clever but ungrammatical Osborne formula to offer as weak a pledge on the Green Belt as possible to allow for its significant loss after the election.

Com[pare the wording for example with the draft UKIP manifesto which is old style Tory.

2 thoughts on “Cameron’s Ungrammetical Pledge Not to Protect the Green Belt – A Deliberate Osborne Fudge to Allow its Loss

  1. Pingback: No Cameron Did Not Say he Will Protect the Green Belt | Decisions, Decisions, Decisions

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s