The National Trust #NPPF report ‘Localism at Risk’

Here commissioned from the LGIU


The government has argued that “seven out of ten local councils have now published Local Plans compared to two out of ten previously, and there is good progress across the remainder”. New research conducted by the LGiU, however, casts doubtnon this analysis. The LGiU estimates that over a quarter (26 per cent) of local authorities will take more than a year to adopt their Local Plan

Respondents to the survey suggested that the Planning Inspectorate, through the examination process, is prioritising development over the views of
local people. The research found that housing land availability was the most common reason for Local Plans being rejected. In contrast, the
research found that communities are most concerned about protection of the natural environment.

Our research has found that the NPPF is, in fact, at risk of undermining localism for two key reasons. First, the challenging schedule set for implementing the NPPF and, second, an apparent centralisation of the planning system. The research also identified two external factors that are making Local Plans challenging to deliver: landbanking and resources in planning departments.

The terminology used in the report is confusing.  All developers need to keep a landbank to ensure flow of sales given the lag from purchase to commencement. The issue is then two fold firstly whether developers are withholding sites from commencement that are viable, to dripfeed the market to keep prices high and secondly to what extent and over what period are sites of marginal viability now considered.  Certainly as we are arguably at the bottom of the market now consideration on strict terms of vaibility now, rather than over say the next 5 years, necessarily pl;aces pressure on green field sites.  These are entirely separate issues and the report somewhat confuses the two.

Further confusion over SHMAs

Supporters of the NPPF have acknowledged that national priorities are taking precedence over the views of local communities. The House Builders Federation, for instance, has criticised some councils for allowing so-called “objective assessments” to be distorted by locally informed “subjective considerations and policy assumptions such as the effect of the recession or environmental and heritage constraints”

Even opponents of the NPPF such as myself acknowledge this is a big big problem, policy based evidence not evidence based policy.  Numbers are distorted everywhere and there is an almost pathological fear of doing SHMAs properly and objectively.  This is an entirely separate issue from once you have established that need what should the targets be and where should it go.  Lets not confuse local views on these policy matters with objectivism on need.




2 thoughts on “The National Trust #NPPF report ‘Localism at Risk’

  1. Relying on the market to produce houses that people can actually afford AND are fit for purpose is becoming more and more of a pipe dream. Even worse is the inherent greed involved in owning land in this country. Landowners are the core land bankers are they not? Most of them appear to enjoy the luxury of sitting on their land until its value increases to a level they demand. How can it be moral to have an area of land worth £4k or £5k an acre one day and hundreds of £000’s the next, just because of a piece of paper that changes its use? And all for doing sweet FA!
    Not only does the government need to intervene to apply some controls of land values where affordable housing is needed, they also need to simplify and speed up the CPO process. Easier CPO would enable local authorities to force the issue by taking control of the required land. such measures might actually bring some sanity to affordable housing delivery in this country.

  2. Pingback: Land Banking and Neighbourhood Plans |

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s